The Final Pandemic: Or, how to stop worrying and love the democide
BUY ON AMAZON
I saw a video promo the other day by Dr. Samantha Bailey for her book The Final Pandemic: An Antidote to Medical Tyranny, authored with Dr. Mark Bailey. The basic premise of the book is that viruses do not exist, or cause disease, but are used to incite fear, create a market for vaccines, and control the population.
So far, so good.
There was no mention of excess deaths in the video, which was no surprise—but in light of the 1.5 million excess deaths in the US since 2020, it was disconcerting to see Bailey wrap things up with a big, bright smile, and confident reassurance that we have nothing to fear, except fear itself:
“There is a great deal of momentum currently, and we are always grateful to be able to help more people than ever move beyond unnecessary fear, and into a better understanding of health and wellbeing.”
While I share Bailey’s dislike of unnecessary fear, when 1.5 million extra people die in a single country in the 3 years following the declaration of a fake pandemic, it seems like a little fear is a good thing—at least, enough fear to motivate us to figure out what is killing us.
I posted a comment about excess US deaths on the video, and responded to another comment, both containing a link to the mortality data. By the next day, both comments had been removed.
Maybe Dr. Bailey assumed all comments with links were spam, and removed them all, regardless of relevance or merit; or, maybe she removed the comments she didn’t like—who knows? Anyway, I added another comment, with no links, mentioning the half-million excess US deaths in 2020, and asking for Dr. Bailey’s opinion about the cause. The comment is still there, but with no response.
Since Dr. Bailey is apparently having difficulty responding, I came up with a few helpful suggestions:
“We didn’t look at the mortality data, because a virus didn’t kill people. Our book is about whether a virus killed people, not about whether something else killed people.”
“Our takeaway message is that people shouldn’t fear any future pandemic declarations. If they knew a lot of people died after the last pandemic declaration, they might fear them.”
“We didn’t go into the mortality data, because we didn’t want to explain why so many people died. We want to help people achieve a greater understanding of health and wellbeing, not defend them from democide. ”
“We didn’t look at the mortality data, because we cannot simultaneously expose and conceal a democide.”
What is (and is not) in The Final Pandemic
After reading the book, I think that, by and large, the information it contains is important, and accurate—as far as it goes. The problem with this book is not so much what is in it, but rather, what was left out.
A chart from the book Dissolving Illusions.
The book does a pretty good job of making a case that viruses have never been proven to exist or cause disease—mostly by citing articles by various well-known alternative media writers, as well as some published research studies.
The book contains information about historical mortality data refuting the bogus “vaccines save lives” narrative, mostly from the extensive work of Dr. Suzanne Humphries and Roman Bystrianyk, including several charts from the website for their book, Dissolving Illusions.
The Final Pandemic also contains references to deaths following COVID19 vaccination, and following the use of toxic COVID19 treatment protocols like Remdesivir.
As I said earlier, the problem is what this book does not contain—which is any real mortality data from 2020 or the years since. It contains no clear information about whether deaths increased or decreased or stayed the same anywhere in the world—a topic that seems eminently relevant in a discussion of What Really Happened during the alleged pandemic.
Based on the snippets of information about mortality that the book contained, I was left with the impression that if any excess deaths occurred, they must have been due to toxic treatment protocols or vaccines. In other words, the book reinforced 2 common narratives used to coverup the COVID19 democide.
What little information we got about mortality in The Final Pandemic reminded me of the Chris Hedges quote at the beginning of the Prologue of the book: “Random facts or obscure bits of data or trivia are used either to bolster illusion and give it credibility, or discarded if they interfere with the message…”
Death spikes around the world following the WHO pandemic declaration
In early June 2020, researcher Dr. Denis Rancourt wrote a paper about dramatic death spikes that occurred in the US, England, and Wales, immediately following the March 14, 2020, World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of a global COVID19 pandemic. Rancourt summarized the paper in an article you can read here.
At the time, Rancourt attributed these death spikes to toxic treatment protocols—but without really trying to prove it through a closer examination of the mortality data. Granted, there is evidence toxic protocols were used—but that doesn’t mean they killed a half-million people in 2020 in the US alone.
This mostly off-the-cuff ‘explanation’ for excess deaths, introduced by Rancourt near the beginning of the alleged COVID19 pandemic, is still widely circulated today—and still lacks any real evidentiary support.
In fact, this claim openly conflicts with the characteristics of the deaths in the New York City mass casualty event, as I suggested in my last post, in the section entitled “Questions about the toxic treatment protocol hypothesis.”
Rancourt included a few charts illustrating the Spring 2020 death spikes in his article from the USA, England and Wales, and Europe, shown here. The red line in the charts indicates the date of the WHO pandemic declaration.
I guess Rancourt still prefers to do things the old-fashioned way, by hand. I remember the nightmare of having to draw charts by hand when I was in grad school 30 years ago—I sure hope he’s not stuck in a time warp.
Regular readers of this blog are probably aware that the Spring 2020 death spike in the US was mostly localized in the New York City metropolitan area, in the states of New Jersey and New York—known as the NYC mass casualty event. Were the death spikes in England and Wales also limited to a particular region of the country, as in the US? Were the initial death spikes followed by a series of death waves over the next 2 years, as in the US? I don’t know the answers to these questions, but I would like to.
Did the death spikes in England and Wales in Spring 2020 have the same cause as the death spike in the US? Commonsense suggests that is a strong possibility.
New Zealand mortality data
Out of curiosity, I decided to see if mortality data was available for New Zealand, where the Doctors Bailey are based. It took me a few hours to locate the official data online, download a spreadsheet of mortality data from 1948—2021 (the most recent year available), and create the chart below of death rates in New Zealand (in green) and the United States (in blue) from 2015—2021. (Notes 1 and 2)
See Notes 1 and 2 for the sources of this data.
NZ does not provide the “crude” death rate per 100,000—it only provides an “age-adjusted” death rate (green dotted line), which it calculates using a standardized age distribution from the WHO. That doesn’t tell us much, but it is more information than I’ve been able to find on how the US calculates its age-adjusted death rate (blue dotted line).
Although NZ does not provide a crude death rate (which is simply the number of annual deaths divided by the size of the population, and multiplied by 100,000), the population data is available, so you can calculate it yourself, which I did for the chart.
Deaths and death rates in NZ actually declined noticeably in 2020. Although that doesn’t necessarily mean there were no death spikes anywhere in NZ that year, it is a pretty good indication there were not, at least not any large ones. There were more deaths in 2021, but the death rate was similar to the rates from 2015-2019—nothing unusual.
So, the Doctors Bailey could have used New Zealand mortality data to bolster their claim that pandemic declarations are nothing to fear. But, of course, that would have opened the door to mortality data worldwide, which does not paint such an innocuous picture of What Really Happened.
A few quotes from The Final Pandemic
I’ve selected a few quotes from the book, to help illustrate the flavor:
“The Final Pandemic is a title that announces that the concept of dangerous and death-dealing ‘germs’ is finished. Hopefully this helps people realize that there is no need to participate in these man-made ‘crises’ ever again.”
“However, it is clear that the only reason that fake pandemics ‘take’ is that the majority of people still feel some threat from microbes, whether they be real biological entities such as bacteria or imagined ones such as viruses. Conversely, when one can see that this model of ‘pathogens’ is invalid, the entire possibility of contagious pandemic is bankrupt and finished.”
“As Dr. Ulric Williams discovered almost 100 years ago, real health is achieved through right thinking and right living. It may initially sound simplistic but everything we do can be measured up to this powerful maxim.[…] We invite you to continue on this journey with us with the knowledge that life is for living, not living in fear.”
It seems the Doctors Bailey are grateful to be able to help more people than ever learn to stop worrying and love the democide.
***
NOTES
1) For New Zealand mortality data, use this link. From the top menu, select Historical Mortality, then select "Download the historical mortality datasets.”
2) For US mortality data from 2018—2021, run this saved search in the WONDER database. For US mortality data from 2015—2017, run this search.
CITATION FOR 2018-2021: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System, Mortality 2018-2022 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released in 2024. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 2018-2022, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10-expanded.html on Jun 3, 2024 6:48:41 PM
CITATION FOR 2015—2017: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. National Vital Statistics System, Mortality 1999-2020 on CDC WONDER Online Database, released in 2021. Data are from the Multiple Cause of Death Files, 1999-2020, as compiled from data provided by the 57 vital statistics jurisdictions through the Vital Statistics Cooperative Program. Accessed at http://wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10.html on Jun 3, 2024 6:54:14 PM