Dear End of Covid: I have some questions about excess deaths
A short rant about online trolls and the US democide coverup
I don’t know who created this image, but it’s genius.
From time-to-time, I comment in online forums with links to US mortality data on my site, if the story is relevant to the US democide. I go to great pains to ensure this data is accurate and easily verifiable. You’d think this would be a pretty innocuous act, considering the contents of the CDC WONDER database are not debatable—everyone who performs the same search will obtain exactly the same results. The official data is always relevant, since even if someone thinks the data may be faulty or faked, they still have to know what they’re disputing (unless they don’t care about looking foolish).
Here are a few basic raw numbers from the official database: About 529,000 more people died in the US in 2020 than died in 2019—an increase of 19%, compared to a typical historical increase of 1%. For example, in 2019, deaths increased by 16,000 ( .6%) compared to 2018; and in 2018, deaths increased by 26,000 (.9%) compared to 2017. So, there were around 500,000 unexplained deaths in the US in 2020. See Note 10 on the CVax Risk page for the source of these numbers.
Unfortunately, online trolls peddling a particular narrative (such as the US democide coverup) don’t look at links, as a rule—there’s no point, since most have neither the motivation nor skills to deviate from their scripted arguments, and are probably required by their employer to stick to the script anyway.
The danger of going off-script is high regarding the US democide coverup, because how does a troll convince people deaths were normal in the US in 2020, when the official data shows deaths were, in fact, extraordinarily high? You can probably see how tricky things could get if a troll started winging it, instead of just regurgitating prepared talking points. Not reading links also keeps trolls at a safe distance from legitimate evidence that they’re full of it—because psychologically, I suspect it would be very hard for average people to deal with the knowledge that they are covering up a mass-murder. So, even though no inside whistleblowers have sent me a troll operating manual, I’d be willing to bet there is such a “no deviation” rule, for the typical low-to-mid-level troll.
“Stimulating discourse” in a typical online forum.
Based on that hypothesis, it makes perfect sense that a typical response to the accurate and readily verifiable mortality data I post is one form or another of, “Liar! Deaths were normal in 2020!,” usually followed by a series of personal insults, and talking points about how this or that expert proved long ago that there were no excess deaths. I suspect 99% of responses like this come from trolls.
These faux guardians of faux truth are often seething with faux outrage about my claim that there were excess deaths. I’ve been accused many times of being an “agent” spreading disinformation and fear. I’ve been accused of perpetuating the COVID19 fraud, because even though I have repeatedly written about the COVID19 fraud, the problem, again, is that trolls never read your stuff before they criticize. They are there to promote an agenda using scripted arguments, and couldn’t care less if they treat you unfairly, or if their claims against you are defamatory—because even if you figured out who they really are, they’ve been assured by their employer that any civil suits against them will be covered by insurance.
If I could somehow get all the time back that I’ve wasted defending myself from false accusations online that I said things I never said, believe things I don’t believe, and posted false or misleading data, I’m not sure what I’d do with it—possibly a 7-week Reno 911! marathon—including the movie and all the extras. It would give me something to laugh about, because this satire we live in just isn’t funny anymore.
Forum owners could help control this kind of hostile environment, but most will not, and in fact, are more likely to reinforce it, in my experience—presumably because they are well aware of, and welcome, the trolls lurking in their forum.
There was no virus—but there was a democide
I think virology is a fraud. I think most virologists believe in it, but are willfully blind to the inadequacy of the science behind it. Incredibly, no virus has ever legitimately been proven to exist in real life as a unique and identifiable organism, and no virus called SARS-COV-2 caused a disease called COVID19.
But although there was no virus, there was a democide in the United States in 2020 and 2021. Over a million more people than usual died in those 2 years, according to the official numbers.
Whatever the cause, it is apparent even to the naked and untrained eye that the number of deaths in the US in 2020 and 2021 was extraordinarily high. It’s not a matter of complicated statistics, or math no one can understand, and it’s not a matter of opinion—the unprecedented increase in deaths is obvious even to a casual observer who looks at the chart below of US population, deaths and death rate for the last 55 years.
See this section of my CVax Risk page for the source of this data.
Deaths in the US came in a series of waves from 2020 thru 2022, which affected different states at different times, and different counties within each state. These death waves are shown in the chart below of weekly deaths in the US from 2019 (in brown) compared to 2020-2022 (in blue).
See this section of the CVax Risk page for the source of this data.
The first in the series of death waves—the strongest and the strangest, in many ways—hit New York City with tremendous force in Spring 2020, killing more than 50,000 extra people over 8 weeks, then disappearing just as suddenly as it had appeared. See if you can spot the NYC mass casualty event in the chart below, showing weekly deaths from 2018-2021 in New Jersey and New York state (in yellow), the NYC metropolitan area (in orange), and NYC proper (in red). It’s tricky, I know—in fact, no public health officials, politicians or major media personalities have spotted it so far.
See Note 1 at this link for the source of this data.
So, when well-known alternative news purveyor Mike Adams raised the issue recently of the possible use of a chemical weapon in NYC, in an interview with End of Covid creators Alec Zeck and Mike Winner, I was stunned, given the ongoing US democide coverup—and thrilled. I had high hopes it was going to be a very important, possibly even groundbreaking, show. That’s because, in spite of my cynicism, I am still plagued by that kind of naive optimism a lot. As you may imagine, I am also disappointed a lot, and this time was no exception.
Mike Adams interviews Mike Winner and Alec Zeck from End of Covid.
The interview
I’m not sure what to call the End of Covid thing—maybe a “lifestyle”? A “state of mind”? A “virtual commune”? I don’t really know much about it. Anyway, Zeck and Winner were promoting their thing recently on Mike Adams’ show.
The show was rolling along with no particular surprises, and as usual, no mention of any excess deaths in 2020, when I was stunned to hear Mike Adams raise the issue of chemical weapons.
In this first clip, which starts at about 1:38:45 in the program, Adams wanted to make sure Zeck and Winner didn’t dispute the idea that chemical weapons can be used to “cause illness and death.”
Adams suggested the possibility a chemical weapon may have been used in New York City in Spring 2020 to simulate a viral outbreak, “with all the real fear.” He pointed out that a way to do that would be to “drop a chemical weapon on a city, make a bunch of people sick, have them show up at the hospital—hospitals are filled, people are dying—and then just call it Covid”—an idea he claimed he talked about “early on”:
I think you can understand from this clip why I was so excited about this interview—Adams basically dropped a bomb, out of the blue, about the NYC mass casualty event. Or did he?
Would it surprise you to learn that, after this compelling introduction, there was no discussion whatsoever about excess deaths in the show? It floored me—quite an impressive slight of hand. Incredibly, the concept of death only came up once more in the discussion about chemical weapons—from Alec Zeck, to imply fear can induce death, as you’ll hear later.
Instead, the topic was immediately watered down into a conversation about whether a chemical weapon could have caused a loss of taste and smell, or even, God forbid, caused “illness” or “dis-ease.”
There was also speculation these illnesses were psychosomatic, or the result of mass hypnosis, or a collective delusion, or had something to do with electromagnetic fields, or mysterious men in black vans.
This baffling omission of the obvious topic of excess deaths in connection with a chemical weapon led to some questions in my mind—I thought I’d share a few of them here.
WARNING: Please STOP READING NOW if you don’t have at least a little sense of humor. Not much is required, since it’s really not that funny.
Alec Zeck
In the following clip, Zeck responded to Adams, saying he thinks the idea that a chemical weapon caused “this illness and a number of other illnesses” is definitely a “valid hypothesis worth exploring.” He didn’t mention the possibility of death from those illnesses. And, Zeck didn’t want to say for sure that a chemical weapon caused “the symptoms that are known as, quote, Covid—which is again an amalgamation of a bunch of already existing symptoms before”:
QUESTION 1 is for Alec Zeck: Do you think the idea that a chemical weapon killed 50,000 people in NYC, or a half-million people in the US in 2020, is a valid hypothesis worth exploring?
Mike Adams, Alec Zeck & Mike Winner
Next, the conversation moved to the perpetually popular topic of why some people lost their sense of taste and/or smell, and why some had what Mike Adams called “severe symptomatic illness.”
Adams said he suffered from “something”—but was able to heal himself with Ivermectin. In a later clip, Mike Winner said he lost his sense of taste and smell, but was able to heal himself with some other product he sells in his store.
Zeck had a plethora of ideas about why the olfactory curse or “illness” may have been visited on some, including that it was “psychosomatic,” or a “zinc deficiency,” or because we are “swimming in a field of non-native electromagnetic fields” and “intersecting electromagnetic fields” and we are “always sharing information with each other.” Zeck concluded with the astute observation that we can’t just assume a chemical weapon caused anything—we need “direct proof that X causes Y.” I suspect Zeck applies a different standard of proof when it comes to intersecting electromagnetic fields:
This clip raised several more questions in my mind for Zeck and Adams:
QUESTION 2: Did a million people think themselves dead in 2020 and 2021—victims of some kind of psychosomatic mass suicide?
QUESTION 3: Did a collective zinc deficiency KILL 50,000 people in NYC over 8 weeks in Spring 2020? Did any products from your stores stop this massacre?
QUESTION 4: Did our collective intersecting electromagnetic fields run amok in 2020 and 2021, psychically mass-murdering a million people?
Next, Mike Winner offered his take on what happened, which involved something he called a “collective miasm.” It sounded like some kind of mass-psychosis that’s heavily influenced by the media, and possibly by electricity—I didn’t really get it, but I take it this concept has been around a long time.
Winner also thought there could have been “operations” going on, such as in New York—and said he knows of unmarked black vans that were spraying unknown substances in small towns in southern Oregon, after which there was an outbreak of “Covid symptoms.”
This clip raised a few questions in my mind for Mike Winner:
QUESTION 5: Do collective miasms commit MASS MURDER? Or is it mass suicide? Does it require high-speed internet or cable TV?
QUESTION 6: Were any miasm-related deaths documented in any death certificates, official exorcism records, stream of consciousness journals, or Ouija board minutes?
QUESTION 7: Did anyone happen to get the license plate numbers of the mysterious men in black vans who were spraying poison everywhere? Or did everyone just figure they knew what they were doing?
The next clip contains the only other reference to death in the chemical weapons conversation, in which Alec Zeck added to Mike Winner’s comments above, which he deemed “perfect.” Zeck pointed out a CDC research study that showed “Covid deaths” were more common in people with a high level of “fear/anxiety-related disorders”:
This clip led to QUESTION 8, for Alec Zeck: Which is the most efficient killer: fear and anxiety, or a chemical weapon?
Finally, in this last clip, Mike Adams suggested that some of “what happened” could be explained by a form of hypnosis that caused people to physically manifest the symptoms of disease. This was demonstrated in a research study where the subjects manifested fake poison ivy, and cigarette burns from imaginary cigarettes:
QUESTION 9 is for Mike Adams: Can hypnosis cause someone to manifest DEATH? I guess that would be the ultimate hypnosis, from which there is no waking up—like a nightmare version of Office Space.